Scholar Vanguard · The 5 Moves Move 1: The Read
Step 1 of 18
Scholar Vanguard · The 5 Moves

Move 1: The Read

Prove you did the work before you claim anything.

Your mission

Build an Idea Bank of verifiable facts from real sources, before you write a single argument sentence.

The prompt you will answer by Move 5

“Why was the Montgomery Bus Boycott an effective form of protest?”

How this works

It is self paced. Work at your own speed, and come back any time: this page remembers where you were. When you reach a gold checkpoint, actually stop and do the task. Do not skip it. The page will not let you past until you do.

What you produce today

An Idea Bank. Two verified facts, one strategy and one outcome, each with its source named. That Idea Bank becomes the evidence in your essay later.

About 60 minutes. You can split it into two sittings.

Your Move 1 goals

What you'll be able to do

Read each one out loud. If you can say it in your own words, you own it.

  1. I can pull verifiable facts out of a real source.
  2. I can rate a source from 0 to 10 on the Trust Score.
  3. I can sort facts into Strategies and Outcomes.
  4. I can fill my Idea Bank, ready for my thesis statement.

Words you'll use

Fact — something a source can prove happened
Evidence — a fact you quote to back your claim
Citation — naming the source of your evidence
Claim — your debatable answer to the prompt
Reason — the “why” behind your claim

What “verifiable” means

A verifiable fact is one that someone else can check and find in a real source. If you can point to where you found it, it is verifiable. If you just feel it, or heard it somewhere, it is not.

The hook · why proof matters

Facts are like texting a photo of the clean sink

Have you ever been asked to do the dishes, and you forgot? You broke trust. To earn it back, just saying “I did them” is not enough.

Click each card in order.

Trust scores · how to rate a source

Rate every source 0 to 10

Some sources are the photo of the sink. Some are just somebody saying “trust me.”

10/10
Government sites (.gov) and primary sources Official records, or written by people who were there. Example: NPS, MLK's “Our Struggle”
7/10
Trusted secondary sources with a named author An expert summarizing history, backed by a university. Example: Encyclopedia of Alabama
4/10
Google AI Overviews Sounds confident, but AI makes mistakes. Use it only to find real sources. Never cite it.
2/10
Wikipedia Anyone can edit it. Use it for the big picture and keywords only. Never cite it.
0/10
Personal blogs with no author or citations No proof, heavy emotion, and no one backing it up. Do not use it.

The rule

Only 10/10 and 7/10 sources go in your Idea Bank. Your claim is only as strong as the source behind it.

Stop and do · rate the sources

Score each source 0 to 10

2:00
Ask three questions about each one. Who wrote it? Were they there, or is it an official record? Can I check where the facts came from?

Scale locked in

You just did what historians do before they read a single word: you checked who was talking.

The source pack · open them as you read

Your three sources

These open in a new tab. Your page stays right here.

10/10 National Park Service
US government article: “The Montgomery Bus Boycott.” Verifiable names, dates, and data.
nps.gov
10/10 MLK, “Our Struggle” (1956)
Primary source: King's own report on the boycott, held by Stanford's King Institute.
kinginstitute.stanford.edu
7/10 Encyclopedia of Alabama
Written by Stewart Burns (Williams College), backed by Auburn University.
encyclopediaofalabama.org

Quick rule

Google AI Overview (4/10) and Wikipedia (2/10) are for finding sources, not citing them. A blog with no author (0/10) is not a source. If you would not trust it with your allowance, do not cite it in your paragraph.

More evidence · national park service

Evidence File: The Lawsuit your turn

Up to now I pulled the facts out for you. This time, you do it.

“Fred Gray, member and lawyer of the MIA, organized a legal challenge to the city ordinances requiring segregation on Montgomery buses.” … “Gray gathered Aurelia Browder, Susie McDonald, Claudette Colvin and Mary Louise Smith to challenge the constitutionality of the city busing laws.” … “On June 5, 1956, a three-judge U.S. District Court ruled 2-1 that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional.”
National Park Service, “The Montgomery Bus Boycott” (nps.gov) · 10/10
3:00
Hunt for a verb for the strategy. Hunt for a date and a decision for the outcome.

How I would have written them

Strategy: MIA lawyer Fred Gray organized a legal challenge with four women. (source: National Park Service)
Outcome: On June 5, 1956, a federal court ruled bus segregation unconstitutional. (source: National Park Service)

Different words are fine if the fact and the source are right. Notice all four plaintiffs were women. That fact supports Reason 5 as well.

Words to know: ordinances = city laws · plaintiffs = the people who sue
Primary source · the 10/10 voice

Straight from Dr. King himself

“We in Montgomery believe that the only way to press on is by adopting the philosophy and practice of non-violent resistance.”
Martin Luther King Jr., “Our Struggle,” Liberation magazine, April 1956 · read the full essay at the King Institute, Stanford

Why a primary source is 10/10

King was there, leading it, while it happened. This is the photo of the sink. It names the strategy in his own words: non-violent resistance, chosen as a philosophy, not just a tactic.

Level-up option

Pull one line from the full essay into your Idea Bank with this citation. That is the Primary Source Challenge on your exit ticket.

Level up · vibes into facts

Watch a feeling turn into a fact

Every writer starts with feelings. First drafts are supposed to. We upgrade them. That is what writing is.

For each one, pick the sentence that could actually be checked by a reader.

Checkpoint · do this before you scroll

Write two facts

One strategy and one outcome, from everything you just read.

The rules

No feeling words (mad, mean, tired, unfair, bad). Just actions, names, numbers, and dates. Name the source next to each fact.

Check yourself

Read your sentences out loud. If someone could only respond with “prove it,” and you can prove it with a named source, you wrote a fact. If they could respond with “that's your opinion,” rewrite it.

Facts that would pass: 381 days · 50,000 leaflets · 90% effective · the Supreme Court ruling

The sort · actions vs results

Every fact is a strategy or an outcome

Strategy

An action: what people DID
refused to ride · held mass meetings · raised money · built a carpool system

Outcome

A result: what HAPPENED because
lasted 381 days · bus revenue collapsed · the Supreme Court ruled segregation unconstitutional

The test that always works

Did a person choose to do this? Strategy. Did it happen to the bus company, the city, or the law as a result? Outcome.

Sort these five

The reveal · where facts become reasons

Your Reason Bank

Pair a strategy with its outcome and you get a reason

That reason is the “why” you will argue in Move 2. In the final essay it becomes a body paragraph: the strategy is your topic sentence, the outcome is your evidence.

1 · Economic Pressure70%+ of riders, plus the money lost — modeled for you in Move 2
2 · Community Organization & Logisticsthe carpool system, plus 381 days — modeled for you in Move 2
3 · Church Networks & Fundraisingmass meetings, plus donations
4 · Legal Strategy & Court DecisionsFred Gray's case, plus the Supreme Court ruling
5 · Women-Led Organizing50,000 leaflets, plus the boycott's launch

Reasons 1 and 2 are the training wheels: they get modeled for you. In Move 2, you argue one of reasons 3, 4, or 5.

The big picture · Move 1 becomes an essay

Where this is heading

Introthesis
Body 1topic + evidence
Body 2topic + evidence
Body 3topic + evidence
Conclusionrestate + so what
  • Your Idea Bank facts become your evidence
  • Your reason becomes a topic sentence
  • Move 2 builds your thesis statement

Nothing you write in Move 1 gets thrown away. It all becomes the essay.

Partner round · classmate, sibling, or parent

2 Goods, 1 Improvement

Parents make great graders.

Partner A reads

“My topic is ______.”
“My strategy fact is ______, from [source].”
“My outcome fact is ______, from [source].”

Partner B responds

Good 1: “I like how you used factual phrasing instead of your opinion when you said ______.”
Good 2: “I like how you named your source.”
Improve: “I think your fact is actually an opinion because ______” or “Can you show me where you found that?”

Then switch roles. Everyone gives feedback. Everyone gets it. That's how real writers work. Working alone? Read your facts out loud to yourself and grade them with the same three responses.

☐
We did the partner roundOr I read mine out loud to myself.
Solo climb · your Move 1 final product

Build your Idea Bank

This organizer is your ticket to Move 2. You'll use these exact facts to build your claim.

Copy it exactly. Not “the civil rights thing.”

The rules

  • Facts from 10/10 or 7/10 sources only
  • Zero feeling words: actions, names, numbers, dates
  • A strategy is an action, not a result
  • Write the source name next to each fact
Self-check · pass before Move 2

The Readiness Gate

All five, or back to the reading slides. Going back is not failing. Every real writer revises.

Not through yet

Unchecked box? Go back to the reading, fix it, and re-check. Revising is how writers grow.

Gate open

All five checks passed. You are ready for the exit ticket.

Exit ticket · your Move 2 starting line

Lock in your reason

Circle the ONE reason you will argue in Move 2.

You can't pick Economic Pressure or Community Organization: those get modeled for you in Move 2.

Level-up menu — was this easy? Prove it.

Next up · Move 2: The Answer

You'll turn your reason into a thesis statement and climb the Claim Ladder from Level 0 to Level 5.

You now have something most writers never build before they argue: a bank of proven facts.

Hand it in

Your Move 1 work

Print this, save it as a PDF, or copy it into an email.